Hot Topics
The Pension Protection Levy
The PPF has published a consultation on its plans for the levy for 2009/10. This announces that the scaling factor will be 2.22 and indicates that this figure is 'unlikely to change' when the final levy determination is published in November. It has also announced that it plans to collect £700 million in levy for the 2009/10 year and that Dun & Bradstreet have been retained as insolvency risk providers for 2010/11 and 2011/12.
A further consultation on the longer term future of the levy is expected later in October.
Pension schemes should take steps now to minimise their levy for 2009/10, for example by certifying deficit reduction contributions or contingent assets.
Briefing note: The 2009/10 pension protection levy consultation (October 2008)
Press release: Punter Southall welcomes announcement from PPF on levy scaling factor September 2008)
GMP Simplification
In September 2008, the Department for Work and Pensions consulted on draft regulations that will enable schemes to convert their Guaranteed Minimum Pensions (GMPs) into ordinary scheme benefits. On the surface, this new option (which will be available from April 2009) is an attractive one, as GMPs are subject to strict regulatory requirements that differ from those for ordinary scheme benefits and hence are complicated to administer.
However the proposed conversion process will not be without its own complications. In particular, GMPs are likely to need to be equalised between men and women before the conversion can take place. As the PPF’s recent consultation on its proposals for GMP equalisation showed, this is not likely to be straightforward.
Briefing note: Simplification of contracted-out benefits (September 2008)
Briefing note: A solution for equalising GMPs? (July 2008)
Good Record-Keeping
At the end of July 2008, the Pensions Regulator (TPR) issued a consultation paper on good record-keeping, which proposed that schemes should hold a core set of data for all scheme members. In addition, trustees should be responsible for identifying what further information is needed to run their scheme efficiently.
TPR intends to proceed initially by educating trustees on the importance of good record-keeping and using guidance to enable them to maintain good records. The proposals are only recommended as good practice, but TPR will reconsider the position in 2009 and may consider enforcing its recommendations at that stage if its ‘educate and enable’ strategy has not achieved an improvement in data quality.
We are very happy to assist schemes who are interested in carrying out data audits to identify problems with their data and to initiate measures to improve data quality.
Briefing note: The Pensions Regulator consults on good record-keeping (September 2008)
Personal Accounts
The proposed launch date for personal accounts is April 2012.This might seem a long way off, but personal accounts are likely to have significant implications for employers who already offer a pension scheme.
From 2012, all employees aged between 22 and State Pension Age with annual earnings in excess of £5,035, must automatically be enrolled into either personal accounts or a scheme that provides at least broadly equivalent benefits.
Whilst not all the details of personal accounts are yet clear, employers should be taking account of the introduction of personal accounts and automatic enrolment when making decisions about pensions today. Punter Southall can help you understand how personal accounts may affect you.
Briefing note: Personal accounts (September 2008)
Press release: Auto enrolment not personal accounts focus for 2012 (September 2008)
Primary and Enhanced Protection
Individuals whose benefits at A-Day exceed the lifetime allowance, initially set at £1.5 million, now have only six months left in which to notify HM Revenue and Customs if they intend to rely on transitional protection of their benefits against the lifetime allowance charge.
Under primary protection, a fixed percentage of the lifetime allowance can be protected. Individuals can continue to enjoy the full flexibility to build up further benefits or transfer to other schemes, but any excess growth over the rate of increase in the lifetime allowance will lead to tax charges.
Individuals who register for enhanced protection are not subject to any test against the lifetime allowance, but instead there is a much more stringent set of rules preventing further accrual and transfers in all but limited circumstances.
Individuals who may wish to take advantage of either sort of protection should take action now in order to ensure that they have submitted their form by 5 April 2009. Trustees or employers may wish to check that any affected members or employees are aware of the deadline.
Briefing note: Countdown to 5 April 2009 for primary and enhanced protection (September 2008)
Cash Equivalent Transfer Values
With effect from 1 October 2008, trustees have taken on the responsibility for setting the assumptions for cash equivalent transfer values on a ‘best estimate’ basis. The Pensions Regulator has issued guidance to help trustees in reaching their decisions. In some respects, the guidance goes further than the legislation itself in setting out the Pensions Regulator’s expectations for trustees, particularly in respect of circumstances in which it might be possible to reduce transfer values.
The final guidance was issued on 29 September and contained very few changes from the draft previously consulted on. Trustees should now take account of the revised guidance when making decisions on their cash equivalent transfer value policies.
Briefing note: The calculation of pension transfer values (October 2008)
Buy-out
Buy-out is fast becoming an issue that many schemes will be looking at either from a trustee or a company viewpoint. Buy-out is no longer just a consequence of a company winding up. It is increasingly being used as a viable option for removing the risks inherent in pension schemes related to investments and longevity.
Prices in the market have become more affordable as bond yields continue to remain relatively high and insurers try to grab a share of what is becoming a very competitive marketplace. Whether the prices can remain low is a matter for debate but what is clear is that there may be bargains to be had at this time if buy-out has been or is expected to be an option considered.
There has also been an explosion of innovation in the buy-out and de-risking area with many non-standard options of passing on a scheme’s risk to insurers now available through such vehicles as buy-ins, partial buy-outs, term buy-outs, longevity swaps, and risk-sharing solutions to name just a few.
Punter Southall has dedicated resources available to help trustees or company representatives consider their options in this topical area.
Briefing note: The impact of buy-out on PPF levies (August 2008)
Briefing note: Opportunities for trustees in the current buy-out market (April 2008)
Briefing note: Opportunities for scheme sponsors in the current buy-out market (April 2008)
Longevity
Longevity has become one of the key challenges for pension schemes.
The Pensions Regulator caused consternation earlier this year with its suggestion of using a minimum rate of future improvements in mortality as a trigger for further scrutiny of a pension scheme. However, it announced in September 2008 that it will not pursue plans for a separate mortality trigger. Instead, the mortality assumption will be used as a 'secondary' trigger when a scheme has already triggered on either its technical provisions or its recovery plan.
The Pensions Regulator has also published guidance to assist trustees in setting their mortality assumptions.
Amongst other developments in longevity, we are expecting the Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI) of the Actuarial Profession to publish its final tables very soon reflecting the actual mortality experience of pension schemes (rather than insurance companies).
Punter Southall has developed a range of tools designed to assist trustees and employers in deciding on appropriate mortality assumptions for their schemes. For further information, click here.
Briefing note: The Pension Regulator's mortality guidance (October 2008)
Briefing note: Latest news on longevity (July 2008)
Briefing note: The Pensions Regulator consults on mortality assumptions (March 2008)
Solvency II
Punter Southall has produced a detailed research paper on the implications if a solvency regime similar to the Solvency II regime for insurance companies were to be applied to pensions. The paper’s key arguments are as follows:
- Pensions and insurance are very different financial instruments and so should be treated differently for funding purposes.
- Existing protections for pension schemes are more than adequate in many European countries.
- Introducing a solvency regime could have a negative effect across Europe, deterring private pension provision.
- In particular, it would have significant effects in the UK, Ireland and the Netherlands, both on pension schemes and their members and potentially on the wider economy.
- Security is itself a benefit and as such has a cost – extra security in funding would be likely to lead to lower benefits.
In September 2008, the European Commission issued a consultation on solvency funding for pension schemes. The focus of this consultation is very narrow and is unlikely to affect the vast majority of UK pension schemes.
Press release: (September 2008)
Briefing note: Solvency and pension schemes (July 2008)
Press release: (December 2007)
Solvency Funding in Pension Schemes: executive summary (December 2007)
Solvency Funding in Pension Schemes: full paper (December 2007)
Appendix A: The UK Pensions Environment (December 2007)
Other Recent Developments
For an overview of other recent developments and topical issues, please see our series of regular technical bulletins and briefing notes.


Myths & realities of pension scheme de-risking (Guildford)